提醒：点这里加小编微信（领取免费资料、获取最新资讯、解决考教师一切疑问！）
Speaking a native language that requires tones appears to boost perception (感知) of melody, but at the cost of rhythm, researchers report April 26 in Current Biology. The massive global study hints at how language skills seep into other areas of cognition. Tonal (声调的) languages use pitch to distinguish words that otherwise might sound the same. In Mandarin, for instance, mü means horse whereas m means mother. Nontonal languages like Spanish sometimes include pitch changes to suggest emotion, for example, but not to change a word’s meaning.
As a Mandarin speaker and flutist, Jingxuan Liu wondered about the crossover between language and music. While studying psychology as an undergraduate at Duke University, Liu helped analyze the musical abilities of nearly half a million people from 203 countries. Her colleagues had launched an online game in which participants completed several musical tasks, including identifying matching melodies at different pitches and finding beat tracks that fit songs’ rhythms.
On average, native speakers of the 19 represented tonal languages were better at the melody task compared with speakers of 29 nontonal languages. And the effect wasn’t small — a tonal first language enhanced melodic perception by about half the amount that music lessons did, which was also surveyed. But tonal language speakers tended to be worse at the rhythm task.
Humans must be choosy about what they pay attention to. Pitch patterns are vital in tonal languages, which might explain the musical trade-off. “You’ve got a finite resource of attention, and you’ve got to allocate that somehow,” says study coauthor Courtney Hilton, a cognitive scientist at the University of Auckland in New Zealand.
Prior research on language and music often compared just two tongues, usually English and Cantonese or Mandarin. But other cultural influences, such as Eastern and Western music styles, could have affected results. By examining a wide range of people, the new study included languages never assessed in this way and reached more general conclusions. “Our result here is showing that the language someone speaks — which is an important part of culture — also shapes cognition, Hilton says.
28. What do the underlined words “seep into” in the first paragraph mean
A. Enter gradually.
B. Control constantly
C Damage slightly.
D. Understand completely.
29. What information can we get from the musical tasks of Jingxuan Liu’s colleagues
A. Tonal languages determine our music abilities.
B. Tonal first languages can take the place of music lessons.
C. Tonal language speakers perform better in the rhythm tasks.
D. Tonal languages help native speakers to better acquire melody.
30. Which of the following statements does Courtney Hilton most agree with
A. The musical trade-off enhances human cognition.
B. The musical abilities boost human perception of melody.
C. A limited span of attention accounts for human musical trade-off.
D. English and Cantonese or Mandarin affect human musical abilities.
31. What is the text mainly about
A. Native language influences human culture.
B. Native language might shape musical ability.
C. Native language is an important part of culture.
D. Native language enhances human melodic perception.
提醒：点这里加小编微信（领取免费资料、获取最新资讯、解决考教师一切疑问！）
