提醒：点这里加小编微信（领取免费资料、获取最新资讯、解决考教师一切疑问！）
Convincing studies have shown that the old adage “you are what you eat” is pretty accurate.But if you weren’t quite convinced to cut back on donuts and choke down some kale,a new study from the University of Illinois might do so: It shows that blood levels of certain molecules that are touted to be healthy—omega-3s, lycopene,B-vitamins,among others—actually correlated not only to cognitive function but also to how the brain functions.
“The basic question we were asking was whether diet and nutrition are associated with healthy brain aging,” said study author Aron Barbey.“And instead of inferring brain health from a cognitive test,we directly examined the brain using high-resolution brain imaging.”
The researchers measured blood levels of nutritional biomarkers in the blood of 115 healthy participants (aged 65-75), including omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids,lycopene,folate,vitamin B12,and vitamin D.The team chose these because they represent many of the healthy compounds from the Mediterranean diet.
They scanned the participants’ brains to view high-resolution images of neural networks,including how the various networks were connected in each participant,and found a correlation between having higher blood levels of many of the nutrients of interest and having better connectivity in certain brain regions.In particular,higher levels of omega-3s,omega-6s and carotene were linked to better network efficiency.
“Efficiency has to do with how information is communicated within the network,” Barbey said. “We looked at ‘local efficiency’—how well information is shared within a spatially confined set of brain regions—and also ‘global efficiency’—how many steps are required to transfer information from any one region to any other region in the network. If your network is more efficiently configured,then it should be easier,on average,to access relevant information and the task should take you less time.”
The team also had the participants take tests to measure cognition,overall intelligence,memory,and executive function—and they were able to correlate these scores with brain connectivity and levels of the nutritional biomarkers.
For instance,omega-3s were linked to general intelligence and to connectivity in the fronto-parietal network, which governs goal-directed behaviors and attentional focus. Omega-6 fatty acids and lycopene were linked to executive function and to the dorsal attention network.
“Our study suggests that diet and nutrition moderate the association between network efficiency and cognitive performance,” said Barbey.“This means that the strength of the association between functional brain network efficiency and cognitive performance is associated with the level of the nutrients.”
39 —one being that most participants were white, educated, and in good health. The study would need to be repeated in a more diverse population before drawing more solid conclusions. Additionally, it’s only correlative, meaning that we don’t know which came first, the brain/cognitive health or the good nutrition/blood biomarkers. There could be reverse causation going on here, so that people who were smarter to begin with ate foods that were healthier, which then showed up in their blood. To really know whether causation was play, you’d have to assign people to eat healthily or poorly over time, which might have some ethical issues.
Still, the study confirms what others have in the past—that eating well may well keep the brain healthy and, in doing so,boost cognition.There are lots of reasons why this is logical, and researchers have laid out many of the biochemical mechanisms behind it,from how lycopene may reduce inflammation to how omega-3s help keep neurons’ membranes more permeable.And plenty of studies have illustrated the flip-side:That unhealthy foods (especially sugar) are linked to reduced brain volume, and poorer cognition.
While science continues to map out all the connections,it’s probably wise to do what we’ve been told for ages—eat well when you can, but don’t beat yourself up if occasionally you can’t.
37.What can we learn from the first paragraph of the passage?
A .Both donuts and kale are considered to be unhealthy food.
B. Functions of molecules like omega-3s have been exaggerated.
C.Blood levels of some molecules influence cognitive function more.
D. Molecules like omega-3s and B-vitamins correlate little to brain functions.
38.How did the researchers carry out the experiment in the passage?
A .They provided Mediterranean diet for the participants.
B. They omitted the measure of taking tests to measure cognition.
C. They had the participants’ brains scanned for nutritional biomarkers.
D.They studied a correlation of blood levels and brain imaging of neural networks.
39.Which of the following can be filled in the blank in the last but 2 paragraphs?
A .The study has a couple of limitations B. The researchers have taken some other measures
C. The research has contributed to some other causation D. The study has come to many other conclusions as well
40.What can we infer from the last three paragraphs?
A .The conclusion is reliable because of its diversity of participants.
B. The smart always prefer healthy food for a better blood biomarker.
C. It seems immoral to have certain participants eat unhealthily over time.
D. People are expected to eat well all the time so as to ensure good cognition.
提醒：点这里加小编微信（领取免费资料、获取最新资讯、解决考教师一切疑问！）
